This collection explores the stakes risks and opportunities invoked in opening and exploring lawâs archive and re-examining lawâs evidence. It draws together work exploring how evidence is used or mis-used during the legal process and re-used after the lawâs work has concluded by engaging with ethical aesthetic or emotional dimensions of using lawâs evidence. Within socio-legal discourse the move towards âopen justiceâ has emerged concurrently with a much broader cultural sensibility one that has been called the archival turn (Ann Laura Stoler) the archival impulse (Hal Foster) and archive fever (Jacques Derrida). Whilst these terms do not describe exactly the same phenomena they collectively acknowledge the process by which we create a fetish of the stored document. The archive facilitates our material confrontation with history historicity order linearity time and bureaucracy. For lawyers artists journalists publishers curators and scholars the document in the archive has the attributes of authenticity contemporaneity and the unique tangibility of a real moment captured in material form. These attributes form the basis for the strict interpretive limits imposed by the rules of evidence and procedure. These rules do not contain the other attributes of the archival document those that make it irresistible as the basis for creative work: beauty violence surprise shame volume and the promise that it contains a tantalising secret. This book was previously published as a special issue of Australian Feminist Law Journal. . Language: English